Sunday, October 29, 2023

Israel At War - Revisited

 

ISRAEL AT WAR – Revisited

 

As this war between Israel and some of its Arab neighbors continues, many Christians are being asked where they stand regarding Israel’s response to the Hamas attack from Gaza in the South, and the continuing threats from Hezbollah in Lebanon from the North. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_Strip) (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/10/what-is-hezbollah-a-look-at-the-lebanese-armed-group-backing-hamas )

To provide some context for my comments to other Christians in that regard, I refer to the Scripture that says: “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning,…(Romans 15: 4). Our Old Testament holds the keys to the answers to many questions. 

Our Bible explains the long-standing hostility between Israel and its Arab neighbors. In fact, the violence and other hostility between the two sides pre-dates even the existence of the Nation of Israel. That history began following what we now commonly call “Noah’s Flood”. Although the Flood affected the entire Earth, my comments will focus on the earlier history and genealogy of Noah’s family and descendants. Of particular note is the impact of their distribution in the Middle East and the regions of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea affected by the war.

In the Old Testament Book of Genesis, Chapter Six notes the births of Noah’s sons Shem, Ham and Japheth. It also records the events / circumstances that led God to flood the Earth…sparing only righteous Noah and his family. Chapters Seven and Eight record the events in the Ark during and immediately following the flood. Chapter Nine documents the Covenant that God made with Noah to never again flood the Earth. It also notes that “…of (the three sons) was the whole Earth overspread.” (v. 19) Chapter Ten presents the names of the generations of the sons of Noah and their sons. It also notes “…by these were the nations divided in the Earth after the flood.” (v. 32) [Note the following website for several maps / images of the distribution of these families:

https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=descendants+of+japheth+geography&fr=mcafee&type=E210US105G0&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fgeography.bible-history.com%2Fproducts%2Fthe-descendants-of-shem-ham-and-japheth-color-map-hi-res-download-1-year-license%2Fshem-ham-japheth-color.jpg#id=0&iurl=https%3A%2F%2Fgeography.bible-history.com%2Fproducts%2Fthe-descendants-of-shem-ham-and-japheth-color-map-hi-res-download-1-year-license%2Fshem-ham-japheth-color.jpg&action=click

A few of the many names in these generations are more recognizable to Christians than the others, so I want to focus on just some of them.  

Shem was the first mentioned of the sons of Noah.  His sons included Elam, Asshur, Arphaxad, Lud and Aram. The names of these sons are not widely recognized but their descendants are more familiar to Bible students. The term “Hebrew” was derived from Shem’s great-grandson, whose name was “Eber”. (Strong’s Expanded Concordance Hebrew and Aramaic Dictionary # 5680)  That family line also extended to include Abram / Abraham (Genesis 14: 13) and the members of the Nation of Israel…leading to our Lord Jesus Christ. Shem’s name gave us the derivative “Semite”, and is used as a classification for his other descendants including the Assyrians, Chaldeans, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, and Arabs, among others. Note these groups include several who have been visceral enemies of Israel. They migrated into the regions of the Western Mediterranean, Southwestern Asia, and the Arabian Peninsula.

Japheth was the youngest son of Noah. His sons included Gomer, Magog Tubal and Meschech, among others. The scripture notes: “By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands;…”(v. 5)   They migrated to areas North, East and West of the Mediterranean Sea, into Eastern Europe and Asia. Japheth’s sons and their descendants are relevant to this discussion because of their prominence in the Old Testament through the Prophet Ezekiel.  Through Ezekiel’s prophecy, the LORD God proclaimed His opposition to Japheth’s sons because of their future war against Israel after Israel had returned to its Promised Land from its centuries of dispersion. (Ezekiel Chapters 37, 38 and 39)

Ham was the middle son of Noah. His sons included Cush and Canaan, among others…and he was the grandfather of Nimrod. Ham’s sons and their descendants migrated to areas South of the Mediterranean Sea in Northern Africa, and Eastward into Arabia south of the Persian Gulf.  Bible students will recognize the name Canaan. The land settled by Canaan’s descendants bears his name and later became known as “Israel’s Promised Land” following the LORD’s Covenant with Abram / Abraham. (Genesis Chapter 15). Following their Exodus from Egypt, and after the people of Israel had wandered in the wilderness for 40 years, God directed Joshua to lead them in battle to possess the Promised Land. (Joshua Chapter One) Note this early violent conflict was directed by God in support of Israel to gain their new land.  (Deuteronomy 7: 1-10); (https://www.biblestudy.org/maps/who-was-israel-to-conquer.html )

Many have questioned why God would support  violence against some Semites, the Japhetites /  Japhetites and Canaanites. The answer lies in further review of history through the Bible, dating back to the post-Flood era. Specifically, the antagonist who was pursuing the agenda of the Enemy Satan was Ham’s grandson, Nimrod.

Rather than trying to describe Nimrod in my own words, I provide the following excerpt from my internet search: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrod):

Traditions and legends[edit]

In Jewish and Christian tradition, Nimrod is considered the leader of those who built the Tower of Babel in the land of Shinar,[8] although the Bible never actually states this. Nimrod's kingdom included the cities of Babel, Erech, Akkad, and perhaps Calneh, in Shinar (Gen 10:10).[9] Flavius Josephus believed that it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began; in addition to Josephus, this is also the view found in the Talmud (Chullin 89a, Pesahim 94b, Erubin 53a, Avodah Zarah 53b), and later midrash such as Genesis Rabba. Several of these early Judaic sources also assert that the king Amraphel, who wars with Abraham later in Genesis, is none other than Nimrod himself.

Josephus wrote:[10]

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers. Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion ...”

In another commentary from the noted historian Matthew Henry, Nimrod is again portrayed as a powerful hunter and forceful leader of men.  He used his skills to dominate his peers, and eventually controlled the people and land of Babel. His lust for power brought him establish his base there, knowing that he was denying and defying the will of God.  [See: https://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/index2.htm , Genesis Chapter 10, Matthew Henry’s Commentary, Verses 8-14.]

Although Nimrod was specifically from the lineage of Ham, Chapter 11 of the Scripture notes that “the whole earth was of one language and one speech”.  Notwithstanding their ancestry / parentage, they had travelled together to Babel. They had individually and collectively rejected God’s instructions to “…replenish the earth.” (scatter) They had all disobeyed God, and followed Nimrod.

At this point I’d like to emphasize that after God confounded the speech of the Nations at the Tower of Babel, He dispersed them. (Genesis Chapter 11) With man having rejected His Supremacy as their true God, the LORD moved to implement the next phase of His Plan for the salvation of mankind. That Scripture is noted in Genesis Chapter 12, where the LORD again calls on one man…this time Abram (later named Abraham)…to lead the implementation of His next step to bring salvation to mankind.  Remember, the LORD always sees the “Big Picture”, while men do not have that perspective of “knowing the end from the beginning”. (Isaiah 46: 9-13)

In my next post I’ll review some additional relevant history that further shows how both sides of this Israel – Hamas conflict are related.  Several families claim Abraham to be their “Father”.

Dr. W. A. (Bill) Robinson

https://christianityandbiblestudy.blogspot.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Why Did God Choose the Middle East for Jesus – Part Two

  Why Did God Choose the Middle East for Jesus – Part Two In Part Two of this post under the same title, we will look further at (1)   thi...